From €95,000
Attack, sovereignty and leakage together.
Six to ten weeks.
TSI / Independent AI audits
Find the security gaps. Test the vendor’s claims.
Get the findings, the repair priorities and a retest.
9 audits
Make the purchase or renewal decision with evidence in your hands.
€30,000 · 3 weeks See scopeKeep company and client information inside the boundary you approved.
See scopeFind exploitable behaviour before an attacker uses it.
See scopeClose gaps in access, secrets, dependencies and deployment configuration.
See scopeProtect tenant separation, confidential outputs and retained information.
See scopeTurn privacy commitments into controls your team can inspect.
See scopeGive your compliance team a usable technical evidence and remediation pack.
See scopeChoose models by accepted results and operating cost on your tasks.
See scopeMake consequential AI work traceable when someone challenges it.
See scopeWhat you will receive
“It runs privately.”
You were told the system is private.
A private model. An unapproved exit. The retrieval tool sends client documents to an external service.
How it works
The named system. The questions. The permitted tests. A fixed fee before work begins.
Inspect the deployment and challenge the claims. Escalate critical findings as they are confirmed.
A prioritised report, an executive readout and one scoped retest of your repairs.
When one question isn’t enough
Attack, sovereignty and leakage together.
Six to ten weeks.
The complete catalogue against a defined estate.
One quarter.
Recurring review as models, code and dependencies change. Twelve-month minimum.
30 minutes · $500 · credited towards your audit
Existing catalogue fees, excluding VAT and travel. Final scope and dates agreed before engagement. A TSI seal requires a separate, completed assessment against its stated criteria.
No. The catalogue includes sovereignty and egress, adversarial attack, AI stack security, data leakage, privacy and purpose, vendor verification, AI Act readiness, model capability and evidence reconstruction.
The adversarial-attack and security engagements test agreed attack paths and security boundaries. Penetration testing and bug hunting must have named targets, written authorisation and rules of engagement; they are not permission to attack third-party systems.
Start with the question you need answered. Data routes point to sovereignty and egress; exploitable behaviour to adversarial attack; stack controls to security. A defined multi-audit programme covers a broader estate.
A scoped evidence report, reproducible findings, prioritised remediation, an executive readout and one scoped retest. Each audit page lists its exact deliverables.
Complete a short system brief, then join a 30-minute preparation call for $500. We review your brief before the call. The $500 becomes a credit towards your audit if you engage TSI.
The catalogue lists each audit’s fee and duration. Vendor verification is listed at EUR 30,000; most individual audits start at EUR 45,000. The final scope, dates, taxes and travel are agreed before engagement.
Enough authorised access to test the agreed system and reconstruct the relevant behaviour. The engagement defines accounts, source material, environments, data handling and prohibited actions before testing begins.
Only within explicitly agreed rules and limits. Use a suitable test environment for disruptive scenarios. Business continuity and handling of sensitive data must be planned before any production testing.
It is a technical readiness and evidence review for an agreed obligation set. Legal advice and statutory conformity assessment are separate services.
No. You buy an independent answer, including failures. A TSI seal requires a completed assessment against stated criteria and applies only to the assessed scope and validity period.
No. The evidence covers the tested scope, versions, conditions and time. Findings identify what was observed, what passed the defined tests and what could not be established.
The audit supplies a remediation plan and a scoped retest. Implementation can be delivered by your team or a separately engaged partner, with independence maintained between building and assurance.
Changes to models, tools, sources, permissions or deployment can invalidate earlier evidence. Retest the affected scope or arrange continuous assurance for an evolving estate.
Name the system and the question.
We agree the scope and a fixed fee before work begins.